How do Nano-biological computers compare with quantum computers? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each?
DNA
computing using algorithmic self-assembly has some of the earmarks of a
near term alternative to quantum computing for solving computationally
intractable problems.
The
advantage is the DNA computing is that it is approximately here today while
quantum computing remains a gleam in
some physicists' eyes.
The
disadvantage of DNA computing is that individual experiments are needed for
each new specific solution (no pun intended) and even automating the process
might extend computerized wetware to the limit.
Molecular
Computation of Solutions to Combinatorial Problems
is a blog-like critique of Adelman's paper of the same name. The critique lists the steps involved and
gives an indication of the magnitude of the operations needed to solve on
specific solution.
"Adleman
implemented a
five (5)-step procedure and discussed each step thoroughly. The steps are as
follows:
STEP
1:
Hybridization and Ligation:
STEP
2: Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Amplification:
STEP
3: Agarose Gel
Electrophoresis:
STEP
4: Affinity Purification
with a biotin-avidin Magnetic Beads
System
STEP
5: Analysis:
"The
author took seven (7) days to complete the experiment, and this research was
repeated as presented here, if the researcher has a working knowledge of how to
perform the laboratory
experiment. Although, I agree with the author that with an automated approach,
this experimental
setup can be done in a few hours and with ease."
Here
are my wild speculations: DNA computing
was sufficiently successful that NSA declared it a national security ultra-top
secret. The result--almost no recent
US recent published papers. Note that
the top researcher was Len Adelman, the A in RSA.
https://larixconferences.com/biotechnology/
https://larixconferences.com/biotechnology/
Comments
Post a Comment